Showing posts with label college. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college. Show all posts

Saturday, June 13, 2009

When it comes to your life and college, be selfish

Britney Wasserman, a student at UNC-Chapel Hill and intern at the Pope Center for High Education Policy, contributed a first-hand account of the decisions that landed her in an unpleasant predicament for the first 2 years of her collegiate experience. Initially, she started at North Florida University, after passing up an opportunity to attend Florida State (where my sister will soon start her Master's program) due to the interests of someone other than her self: her boyfriend.

It is very easy for any of us, especially in our early years, to attempt to please those whom we care about most (teachers, parents, mentors, significant others) by valuing their interests above ours. This is perfectly fine when we are thinking about where to go out to dinner, but there is no place for it when we are faced with life-changing events like going to college or choosing a career path. Advice and counsel can be welcomed, but in the end, our personal interests must take priority above all other factors, even those of loved ones, in guiding our final choices.

Britney's story had a happy ending, even with the breakup with her boyfriend. I saw this to some degree while an undergrad, given that Tennessee Tech did have a regional student body with plenty of high school couples. Unlike a weaker and disinterested North Florida, TTU is a proven institution with a strong academic tradition, respected programs, and an overachieving faculty in numerous subjects. However, regardless of the prestige of the college, if it is not the right fit for the individual student, the chances of success are minimal (as they were for many of my former temporary classmates).

Being selfish when it comes to your college (especially given the money involved), or your career, is the responsible course of action. It could even mean that the best interest of your future would be better served on a path that doesn't involve traditional higher education (though will require some form of lifelong learning, as all careers and pursuits do). Regardless the case, if you have researched and identified a prudent path to achieving through the pursuit of personal passions, do not let the interests of anyone stand in your way.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Handling the "Worthless Crap" label

I knew I would eventually find one of these posts to work with that was recent and relevant. Courtesy of "Captain Capitalism" (h/t Phi Beta Cons) we have another example of perhaps the most common criticism made of many seeking career opportunities or life direction that do not "have a plan" or know where to go: they are "worthless crap."

In this case, the blogger hypothesizes that government does not work because its officials have the wrong backgrounds. Using his home state (Minnesota) legislature as an example, he argues that only 19% of its members earned college degrees in "worthy" subjects. He considers worth degrees to be those that "actually have some kind of net positive benefit to society," while the remainder majored in "'worthless freaking crap'... degrees rich spoiled kids pursue as a hobby with no real intention of ever finding a real job."

There is no need to provide his lists for each category. You know them already because your academic pursuits (past, present, or future) have likely been labeled by many people (parents, teachers, friends, and so on) as either having tangible, productive value, or simply "worthless" endeavors that will provide no benefit beyond the classroom. Captain Capitalism does argue that many business management degrees (not Accounting or Economics, but those involving procedural topics such as general management and HR) as worthless, too.

In the end, our theorist contends that the difference between worthy and worthless has to do with the presence (or lack thereof) of mathematics in the chose field of study:

"The MORE math a major has, the LESS likely these lazy slobs are to pick it as a major. Ergo, they are not majoring in a discipline or study that actually will produce something of worth to society, they choose to major in a hobby that requires little to no math simply because math is difficult."

Of course, all of this is only serving to depress many of you. Perhaps you are thinking back to your classroom days, whether it be high school or college, and are asking yourself "if I had only done my math homework" or "I should have listened to that career counselor and chosen medicine over philosophy."

Nothing will change your past. Honestly, you really do not need to. If you are not sure about your interest in such an intensive career as medicine, engineering, accounting, or another form of applied science, there is no guarantee that you would have continued on the path to completion. More than likely, you would have dropped off somewhere along the way, feeling even more disenchanted with your future. That does not mean that you can simply ignore the importance of work ethic and understanding the concept of certainty (both developed through the study of math and applied sciences) either.

The key fact to consider is that your choices are not "worthless," even if they are wrong. A former (and my only) college roommate earned his first degree in music education. I could tell he had strong analytical characteristics and impressive work ethic and personal discipline that enabled him to excel at his chosen instruments. However, less than a year after graduating, with a few months of high school music teaching under his belt, he visited our school again to look at a degree in engineering (don't know much else, but I think he is doing well regardless).

Does any of this mean his first four years of college were "worthless?" Absolutely not! Neither was my first year as an engineering major and four subsequent years earning degrees in history and political science. Our initial paths may not work out completely, but they serve to show us what our true passions are and how our skills and talents can best incorporate them into a successful career. My youngest sister may have a degree in dance, but she is by no means "worthless" when you consider that she also manages productions, teaches dance to children, sews and stitches costumes for almost everyone she knows, and builds sets.

There is, however, "worthless crap" amongst us. You cannot identify it on the basis of a credential or diploma, for these qualifiers tell us little about the person who possesses them. The key is their backgrounds, experiences, and results. For every philosophy major who "contemplates their navel" before heading off for their half-shift at the local free-trade coffee shop, there is likely one who owns a successful business that succeeded by tying their education to other interests and personal strengths.

There is also, very likely, an accounting or engineering graduate depressed about the world around them, unable to contribute because while they possess the analytical skills sets, they do not have the passion or desire to apply them. None of these people are "worthless," but in some cases, the intentions and directions they received along their path might as well be.

From a policy perspective, I can agree with the writer that government does possess a strong percentage of people who do not possess the experience and perspective to understand the impact of their decisions and policies on the public they are supposed to serve. Often times, as a professional public administrator, I question my own understanding of this critical dynamic. The point about the importance of math is also very applicable. It was a favorite school subject for my father and his parents, and I enjoyed it as well (being the only History/Political Science major to graduate that year with a full year of Calculus).

My professional success is tied directly to my analytical abilities, especially when it comes to math. However, effective perspective requires knowledge of many other subjects and disciplines. In public policy, given the requisite to achieve and maintain equity with respect to a given service or activity, one must consider the history, philosophical backgrounds, and other aspects of the public and the jurisdiction as a whole.

There is also something else lacking in Captain Capitalism's arguments that is most troubling. At no point does the writer mention the role of faith, as an element of character or component in proper decision making and work ethic. Faith is the key to uncovering passion and tying it to our natural talents and abilities. Faith is not a set process, but rather a vehicle for spiritual exploration with no certainty of timeline or limits on false starts and failures. We might want to find our way to our "chosen" futures as quickly as possible, but faith is more concerned in directing us to where we really want to go, no matter how long the trip.

Nothing that helps lead someone to a future of achievement, however we as individuals interpret it, is "worthless crap." In the end, that seems to be the most contradictory component of Captain Capitalism's argument. Capitalism succeeds best in an environment that respects individual liberty, which encourages the individual, not those around them, to prioritize the value they place on themselves above how they are considered by others. If we limit declarations of value to those with certain academic pursuits or careers and discourage them from the pursuit of their passions, then we turn against the environment that enables the greatest possible success and opportunity for all. In some ways, we have seen that for long enough already.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Rush is Right... on college

Regardless of what I think politically, I agree with anyone who believes that Rush Limbaugh is a polarizing individual. He would probably concur as well. However, there are times that he is absolutely right without question, once you take the political ideology out of his comments.

Such is the case with the state of modern higher education. On his radio program today, Mr. Limbaugh took a call from a collegian who complained about the atmosphere of the campus and his fellow students. The monologue in response to this call provides the basis for an excellent argument against what our colleges and universities are today, applicable from numerous angles.

Naturally, the comments possess strong political sentiments (for the record, I tend to agree with them). However, that does not change the true essence of Mr. Limbaugh's point, particularly when applying his own life story (and personal dislike for attending college) to the situation at hand.

The most important point he makes is the following:

If a person does not leave college as an independent, critical thinker, it was a waste of time -- and college as a waste of time under that definition, because you don't have a lot of independent thinkers coming out of there... We all know that college is not about developing the individual. We all know that college is not about preparing individuals to pursue their own happiness with confidence, to have their own unique solutions for the problems that await them.
I absolutely agree with this. I doubt that many parents and potential college students, as they visit the institutions of their choice, think about freedom, individual creativity, or pursuit of substantive self-confidence, or ask questions that enable them to determine if the school provides an applicable environment. The tour and discussions are about majors, job placement, social life, pedigree, networking, and a host of other issues that focus least on who a student is in the singular sense.

Unlike Mr. Limbaugh, I love college and the classroom environment. I practically grew up on a campus and cannot wait for the opportunity to return there. The thought of encouraging the intellectual development of others, particularly when it comes to embracing the creativity necessary to achieve substantive success with the capacities God gave us, drives me toward this passion.

For those thinking of college, I would only recommend it if the passion for the knowledge and associated career you strive for gives you the fortitude to withstand the assault that awaits in the classroom for the first day of the first semester. Within the first week of a student's tenure, they will be challenged by faculty and fellow students to a point where they will be forced to choose between the beliefs and values that guided them so far to success and strength (which they will be told are not acceptable to achieve collegiate greatness) and the path of ideological conformity masked within a counterculture that either encourages social supremacy or non-substantive academic elitism.

Choosing to stay true to who you are does not mean that college will not change you. It is a great time to learn and grow and develop greater appreciation and understanding of your passions, especially if you can learn new ways to apply them. The classroom can be a conduit, even with the most difficult of professors, but it is not the source. Anything that will be worth knowing has to be acquired on your own.

The same is true for careers. Naturally, we all have to pay the bills, but that does not mean that we do ourselves any favors when we choose to commit ourselves to a profession or long-term plan that does not enable us to do what we want. I may not be a professor, but my employment allows me to apply the skills I enjoy most and develop the background of experience that will serve me best in providing real-world examples and perspective once the opportunity for a teaching position presents itself. At the same time, through avenues such as this and other forms of professional and public outreach, I do get to engage in teaching others about those subjects and topics that interest me most.

To conclude, Mr. Limbaugh's beliefs on the positions of the Obama Administration or practically every other political or social issue may drive you to madness or insanity. I cannot help that. However, nobody can argue with his track record of personal success and his ascension to significant prominence in American media and politics. That would have only been possible because of his determination to pursue his passions in life and discounting those conventions that only stood in his way. For every individual, this is a path to achievement worth understanding.